Linking the Federal Reserve Policies to Maryland

January 21, 2010

Thomas

Over the last two years, there has been a crisis in the real estate industry throughout the country and Maryland that has had an impact on the Maryland economy.  Commentators have criticized different actors for this housing crisis and the latest one is the Federal Reserve Bank. The main argument is that the Federal Reserve Bank kept federal interest rates too low for too long, which led people and banks to inflate the market value of houses.

In a monthly survey of business and academic economists done by the Wall Street Journal, 68% of the respondents said that low federal interest rates were partly to blame for overvaluation of the housing market. Interest rates were so low that many people were rushing to buy houses and too many people were in the business of flipping houses while banks were looking for easier ways to lend money which led to the creation of subprime mortgage loans for example.

  • Interest rates were kept under 2 % from the end of 2001 to the end of 2004, and increased slowly to 5.3% until July 2007.
  • At the same time, home prices became inflated in many markets throughout the country.  From the first quarter of 2001 to the first quarter of 2004, Anne Arundel County’s average home price increased from $205,046 to $309,888, a 51.1% increase.
  • A very high increase given that from the first quarter of 1998 to the first quarter of 2001, the average price rose 13.3%.

Since 2007, the average prices of houses sold have declined as well as the number of houses sold.  In Anne Arundel County, the average price of settled house sales was nearly $420,000 in the third quarter of 2006 and 603 houses were sold, while in the third quarter of 2009, the average price was nearly $350,000 and 426 houses were sold.  The difference was a 16.6% decrease in the average price and 29.4 % decrease in the number of houses sold.  Some people believe that this price decrease has been the result of the Federal Reserve Bank keeping interest rates at record low levels for too long leading to the housing bubble burst.

It is hard to pinpoint the exact cause of the housing price inflation that occurred in the real estate market; but there is some truth in criticizing the Federal Reserve Bank for keeping interest rates too low for too long and thus failing to avoid a real estate bubble.  There is one thing many people can agree on, however, the real estate burst has had an impact in many aspects of the Maryland economy and helps explain some of the troubles facing Marylanders, the State government, local governments and many businesses.


How is Maryland fairing in the National Unemployment Forecast?

December 10, 2009

Thomas

One of RESI-AEHS’s constant projects is to analyze and forecast the Maryland economy, specifically employment.  Lately, as you may be aware, the national economy has not performed well.  The latest available national unemployment rate in November was 10%, 3.2 percentage points higher than the rate posted in November 2008.  In the week ending Nov. 28th, the preliminary figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 457,000, a decrease of 5,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 462,000, according to the Department of LaborYet, as we hear bad news regarding the national state of employment, Maryland’s performance has been more resilient.

  • 7.3% of Marylanders who were actively looking for work were unable to obtain employment as of October.

This percentage is still high compared to October 2008’s unemployment rate of 4.8% and above what is considered the full employment unemployment rate of 3.0% (this is the lowest level of unemployment that can be sustained given the structure of the economy).  However, the 7.3% figure was lower than many States, such as California (12.5%) and Florida (11.2%).  Now, how is it that Maryland can outperform a State like California?

There are a variety of reasons for Maryland’s healthier performance when compared to California and following are two reasons.

  • First, fewer people engaged in the rush of gaining profit by investing in the real estate industry.  The rate of foreclosed houses in California for October 2009 was 1 in 156 houses while in Maryland the rate was 1 in 348 houses.  A large number of houses were foreclosed in Maryland, but the number paled in comparison to California.
  • Second, the governmental sectors, especially the Federal government sector, have an important presence in Maryland, causing a multiplier effect to other sectors.  In 2008, the government sector was the largest supplier of jobs in Maryland (18.6%).

This leads us to the question of; so what is the forecast of employment in Maryland?  In 2010, Maryland will continue to fare better than the national unemployment rate but not quite as well as in 2008 (In 2008, the Maryland unemployment rate averaged 4.4%).  The Maryland unemployment rate should decrease to the 2008 level in the year 2013 according to our forecast.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.